Evaluating approvals and settings
I need to think about the approvals and sandbox settings since I haven't been informed about those yet. Typically, I'd assume things like workspace-write and network enabled, but accessing news does require network usage. I want to ensure we’re being mindful of privacy. It may be safer to check if the user wants me to verify or fetch sources. I should ask if they want a summary, source check, or context.Considering context for Vicario
I need to provide a brief context regarding Vicario, the goalkeeper for Tottenham Hotspur. Inter Milan might be exploring options based on Sommer's age or Onana's departure. It’s important not to claim that fans booed him; instead, I can frame it as a rumor. I will outline factors like Inter's goalkeeper succession, Vicario's contract, and market value while keeping it concise and structured, perhaps in bullet points. Should I ask if they want verification?Evaluating sources and next steps
I see that Gazzetta, or "意大利《米兰体育报》," is credible but can sometimes be speculative, so I'll say "据传来自米兰体育报." Since the user mentioned "米体," I'll keep that label too. I can mention Yann Sommer's contract with Inter, possibly until 2026, but I want to avoid diving into too many details. Instead, I can propose that Inter might be looking for a long-term successor. I should think about checking the original article, summarizing it, or looking into transfer status and contracts.
你是在分享一条转会传闻吗，还是想让我帮你核实消息来源与可靠性？
快速解读
- 这更像是“立场+情绪驱动”的转会流言：把“被本队球迷嘘”与“考虑加盟对手”关联，传播性强但需核实来源与表述原文。
- “米体”一般指米兰体育报（La Gazzetta dello Sport），在转会期有一定可信度，但标题党与推测性报道也不少，需看原文措辞（如“考虑/评估/可能/有意”等模糊词）。 
- 维卡里奥是热刺首发门将；国米方面的逻辑更可能是“为资深门将的后续接班做储备”。现实阻力在于合同年限、转会费与英超薪资结构。 
- 关键核验点：是否真有“被自家球迷嘘”的客观场景与时间点；原报道是否将其与转会意向直接因果绑定，还是媒体推断。
需要我帮你做哪一步？
- 查原文链接并翻译要点，看看原话与语气强度
- 对比多家权威来源（如迪马济奥、罗马诺、都体/共和报）一致性
- 结合门将市场与两队阵容、合同信息做可行性评估
选个数字告诉我就行，或者补充你更关心的点。